Seat Ateca 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Seat Ateca is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 116 - 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 340 NM | 142 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 11 seconds | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | |
| In general, Seat Ateca are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota C-HR. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 5.5 | 3.9 - 6.9 | |
|
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota C-HR. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.56 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Ateca is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 377 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`937 kg | ~ 1`898 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`321 kg | ~ 1`413 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 616 kg | ~ 485 kg | |
| Seat Ateca load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Toyota C-HR. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |