Seat Ateca 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 340 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 11 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Seat Ateca are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Kadjar. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 5.5 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Seat Ateca equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1478 litres | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`937 kg | ~ 1`935 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`321 kg | ~ 1`409 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 616 kg | ~ 526 kg | |
| Seat Ateca load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Renault Kadjar. Therefore, Seat Ateca is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |