Seat Ateca 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 340 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 11 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 5.3 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Seat Ateca equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 38 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`937 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 14 000 | |
|
| ||