Seat Ateca 2016 vs Renault Kadjar 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Seat Ateca
2016 -
Renault Kadjar
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.2 - 1.6


Power: 115 - 150 HP110 - 130 HP
Torque: 200 - 340 NM205 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 11 seconds9.9 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 5.33.8 - 5.6
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Seat Ateca equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 4.34 m4.45 m
Width: 1.81 m1.84 m
Height: 1.60 m1.61 m
Seat Ateca is smaller.
Seat Ateca is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres472 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1478 litres
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 38 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`937~ 1`935
The Renault Kadjar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
above average

Average price (€): 21 40012 400
Pros and Cons: Seat Ateca has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Renault Kadjar has
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: