Seat Ateca 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 340 NM | 208 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 11 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 5.3 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. On average, Seat Ateca equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Seat Ateca is smaller. Seat Ateca is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Ateca is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 7 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`937 | ~ 2`059 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Ateca has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |