Seat Ateca 2016 vs Audi Q3 2011

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Seat Ateca
2016 -
Audi Q3
2011 - 2014
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.4 - 2.0


Power: 115 - 150 HP140 - 211 HP
Torque: 200 - 340 NM250 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 11 seconds6.9 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 5.35.2 - 7.7
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Q3. On average, Seat Ateca equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 4.34 m4.38 m
Width: 1.81 m1.83 m
Height: 1.60 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Ateca is 5 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 510 litres460 litres
Seat Ateca has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 50 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`937~ 2`105
The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
above average

Average price (€): 21 40013 200
Pros and Cons: Seat Ateca has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi Q3 has
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: