Seat Ateca 2016 vs Audi Q3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 140 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 340 NM | 250 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 11 seconds | 6.9 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 5.3 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Seat Ateca petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Q3. On average, Seat Ateca equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Seat Ateca is 5 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 460 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Ateca has 50 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Ateca is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Seat Ateca can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`937 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 13 800 | |
|
| ||