Seat Arosa 1998 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.6 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Arosa consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Arosa 1998 1.7 engine: The engine is not very powerful or dynamic, but it is robust. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |