Seat Arosa 2000 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Seat Arosa and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |