Seat Arosa 2000 vs Suzuki Alto 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 73 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Arosa is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arosa engine produces 21 HP more power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 122 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Thanks to more power Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.4 | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arosa consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Arosa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is larger. Seat Arosa is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 14 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 8.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |