Seat Arosa 1997 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Toyota Starlet is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 15 HP less power than Toyota Starlet, but torque is 1 NM more than Toyota Starlet. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.8 | |
| Seat Arosa consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 460 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Starlet gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota Starlet, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arosa is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |