Seat Arosa 1997 vs Suzuki Alto 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 54 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 73 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Seat Arosa is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arosa engine produces 6 HP more power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Thanks to more power Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.4 | |
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arosa consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
Suzuki Alto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.54 m | 3.50 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
Seat Arosa is larger. Seat Arosa is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 14 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 8.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |