Seat Arosa 1997 vs Seat Arosa 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Seat Arosa 1997 and Seat Arosa 2001 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Arosa 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
The Seat Arosa 1997 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Arosa 1997 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa 2001, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa 1997 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Arosa 1997 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa 2001. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
590 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.54 m | 3.55 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa 1997 is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa 2001, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 790 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | 1`400 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
| |