Seat Arosa 1997 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 17.7 seconds | |
| Seat Arosa and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |