Seat Arosa 1997 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 106 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Peugeot 106. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.7 | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arosa consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 106 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.38 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 14 cm shorter than the Peugeot 106, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Peugeot 106 has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 85 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 163 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Seat Arosa has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |