Seat Arosa 1997 vs Nissan Micra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 79 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 7 NM more than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arosa consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 18 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 960 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 76 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Arosa has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Arosa, so Seat Arosa quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |