Seat Arosa 2001 vs Toyota Yaris 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Arosa) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Yaris) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Arosa is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arosa engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arosa consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arosa consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 1999 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is smaller. Seat Arosa is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Arosa is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 175 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Yaris (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |