Seat Arosa 2001 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2003

 
Seat Arosa
2001 - 2004
Volkswagen Lupo
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP105 HP
Torque: 116 NM130 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds11.8 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Arosa engine produces 45 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.44.9
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Arosa consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 375 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 470 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
580 km on highway820 km on highway
Volkswagen Lupo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.55 m3.53 m
Width: 1.64 m1.62 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
790 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`415no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Lupo has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv