Seat Arosa 2001 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 45 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 4.9 | |
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arosa consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arosa could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 34 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
580 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Lupo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.55 m | 3.53 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`415 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |