Seat Arosa 2001 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Fox is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arosa engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Volkswagen Fox. Due to the lower power, Seat Arosa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arosa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arosa consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Seat Arosa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arosa consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.55 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is smaller. Seat Arosa is 28 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Arosa is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 130 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Arosa has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |