Seat Arosa 1997 vs Volkswagen Polo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 8.7 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 4.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Seat Arosa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 975 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 185 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | ~ 1`416 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |