Seat Arosa 1997 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 50 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 3.0 - 7.5 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Lupo. On average, Seat Arosa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 860 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Lupo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Volkswagen Lupo has
| |