Seat Arosa 1997 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 11.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 6.8 - 7.8 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Starlet. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 20 cm shorter than the Toyota Starlet, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arosa is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | ~ 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |