Seat Arosa 1997 vs Suzuki Alto 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 73 - 77 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 5.4 - 7.2 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is larger. Seat Arosa is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 14 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 8.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 1.5 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |