Seat Arosa 1997 vs Seat Arosa 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.0 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 50 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 86 - 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 10 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 3.0 - 7.4 | |
|
Seat Arosa 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Arosa 2000. On average, Seat Arosa 1997 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arosa 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arosa 1997 is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Arosa 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | ~ 1`381 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Seat Arosa has
| |