Seat Arosa 1997 vs Peugeot 106 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 50 - 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 74 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 5.3 - 8.8 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106. On average, Seat Arosa equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.38 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 14 cm shorter than the Peugeot 106, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arosa is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Peugeot 106 has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 85 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 163 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | ~ 1`328 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |