Seat Arosa 1997 vs Citroen C1 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 4.5 - 4.6 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C1. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Seat Arosa is 11 cm longer than the Citroen C1, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 712 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Seat Arosa has 9 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C1. This could mean that the Seat Arosa uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arosa (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.6 metres more than that of the Citroen C1, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | ~ 1`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Citroen C1 has
| |