Seat Arosa 1997 vs Audi A2 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 126 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.4 seconds | 9.8 - 14.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.6 | 2.9 - 5.9 | |
|
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A2. On average, Seat Arosa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Seat Arosa is smaller. Seat Arosa is 29 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Arosa is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 260 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`409 | ~ 1`452 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Audi A2 has
| |