Seat Arosa 2000 vs Mini Cooper 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 149 - 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.7 seconds | 9.1 - 10.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.4 | 6.7 - 6.9 | |
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mini Cooper. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.55 m | 3.63 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
Seat Arosa is smaller, but higher. Seat Arosa is 8 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Arosa is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 160 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | 670 litres | |
Seat Arosa has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mini Cooper. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arosa (by 120 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Seat Arosa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`381 | ~ 1`480 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |