Seat Arosa 2000 vs Fiat Panda 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Seat Arosa is available only with front wheel drive, while Fiat Panda can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.1 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 100 HP | 54 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 88 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.7 seconds | 9.5 - 20 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 6.6 | |
Seat Arosa petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Panda. On average, Seat Arosa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Panda. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.55 m | 3.54 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.58 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
Seat Arosa is larger, but lower. Seat Arosa and Fiat Panda are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 206 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
790 litres | no data | |
Fiat Panda has more luggage space. Seat Arosa has 76 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Panda. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Arosa is 1 metres more than that of the Fiat Panda, which means Seat Arosa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`381 | ~ 818 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arosa has
|
Fiat Panda has
| |