Seat Arona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arona engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arona consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Seat Arona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arona consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arona and Nissan Juke are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 797 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage capacity. Seat Arona has 46 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 483 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |