Seat Arona 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arona engine produces 33 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arona consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Seat Arona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arona consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.64 m | |
| Seat Arona is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arona is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Arona has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 61 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Seat Arona can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |