Seat Arona 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Seat Arona engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Arona consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arona could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Arona consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Mitsubishi ASX 2017 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.64 m | |
| Seat Arona is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arona is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Arona has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 61 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |