Seat Arona 2017 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arona and Opel Mokka have the same engine power, but Seat Arona torque is 45 NM more than Opel Mokka. Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arona consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Seat Arona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arona consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Arona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Arona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Seat Arona is smaller. Seat Arona is 14 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arona is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Arona has 44 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 92 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Seat Arona can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`764 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Arona, so Opel Mokka quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |