Seat Arona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Seat Arona engine produces 99 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.4 | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arona consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Seat Arona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Seat Arona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arona is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 2 cm wider, while the height of Seat Arona is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 786 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Arona has 193 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 494 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |