Seat Arona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arona engine produces 2 HP less power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 42 NM more than Nissan Juke. Despite less power, Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arona consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Seat Arona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arona consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arona and Nissan Juke are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 797 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage capacity. Seat Arona has 185 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 483 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |