Seat Arona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Seat Arona and Nissan Juke have the same engine power, but Seat Arona torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Juke. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arona consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Seat Arona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arona consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arona and Nissan Juke are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage capacity. Seat Arona has 46 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |