Seat Arona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arona engine produces 1 HP more power than Nissan Juke, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Seat Arona is smaller. Seat Arona is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Arona is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 1305 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Seat Arona has 22 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Seat Arona can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |