Seat Arona 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arona engine produces 2 HP less power than Nissan Juke, but torque is 20 NM more than Nissan Juke. Despite less power, Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arona and Nissan Juke are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 422 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage capacity. Seat Arona has 46 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 858 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
| |