Seat Arona 2017 vs Suzuki Vitara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arona engine produces 2 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 44 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Despite less power, Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Arona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Arona consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Seat Arona over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Arona consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.61 m | |
| Seat Arona is 4 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Arona is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1280 litres | 710 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Arona has 25 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The Suzuki Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Seat Arona can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |