Seat Arona 2017 vs Hyundai Kona 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is more dynamic to drive. Seat Arona engine produces 10 HP more power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Hyundai Kona. Thanks to more power Seat Arona reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.3 | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Arona consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Arona could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 38 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Kona gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Arona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Arona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Arona is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Kona, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 361 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1280 litres | 1143 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Hyundai Kona may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Arona is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Kona, which means Seat Arona can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`137 kg | 1`376 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 603 kg | 504 kg | |
| Seat Arona load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Hyundai Kona. Therefore, Seat Arona is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Arona has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |