Seat Altea 2004 vs Renault Scenic 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
Seat Altea is more dynamic to drive. Seat Altea engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 168 NM more than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Seat Altea reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Seat Altea is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Altea consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Seat Altea over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Altea consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
1170 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
820 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Seat Altea gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Renault Scenic 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
Seat Altea is 2 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Altea is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 406 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Seat Altea has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Scenic, so Seat Altea quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Altea has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |