Seat Altea 2004 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Altea is more dynamic to drive. Seat Altea engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Nissan Almera Tino. Thanks to more power Seat Altea reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.6 | |
|
The Seat Altea is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Altea consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Seat Altea over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Seat Altea is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Altea is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Altea is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Altea has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |