Seat Altea 2007 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 121 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Seat Altea engine produces 16 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
770 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.42 m | |
Seat Altea is 11 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Altea is 15 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 409 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Seat Altea has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Seat Altea, so Seat Altea quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Altea has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |