Seat Altea 2007 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Seat Altea engine produces 31 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Seat Altea is smaller. Seat Altea is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Altea is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 409 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Altea, so Ford C-Max quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Altea has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |