Seat Altea 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Seat Altea engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Seat Altea is smaller. Seat Altea is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Altea is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Altea, so Ford C-Max quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Altea has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |