Seat Altea 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Seat Altea engine produces 31 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Seat Altea reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
By specification Seat Altea consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Seat Altea over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Altea consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
840 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
Seat Altea is smaller. Seat Altea is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Altea is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 409 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Ford C-Max has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Altea, so Ford C-Max quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford C-Max has
| |