Seat Altea 2009 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Seat Altea and Skoda Yeti have the same engine power, but Seat Altea torque is 30 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Seat Altea reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
| Seat Altea is 27 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Altea is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 532 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`124 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Altea has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Altea has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |