Seat Altea 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 200 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 350 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 14.8 seconds | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.4 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Seat Altea petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Seat Altea equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Seat Altea is smaller. Seat Altea is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Altea is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 409 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Seat Altea has 141 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`364 | ~ 1`958 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Altea has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |