Seat Altea 2009 vs Skoda Yeti 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Seat Altea
2009 - 2015
Skoda Yeti
2009 - 2013
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 2.01.2 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 85 - 211 HP105 - 160 HP
Torque: 130 - 350 NM175 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 15.1 seconds8.4 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 7.56.6
Seat Altea petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Yeti.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.22 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.60 m1.69 m
Seat Altea is 25 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Altea is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 532 litres405 litres
Seat Altea has more luggage capacity.
Seat Altea has 127 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Yeti.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Altea is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Seat Altea can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`087~ 2`065
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 50006400
Pros and Cons: Seat Altea has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Skoda Yeti has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv