Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes Vito is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 27 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 11.7 | |
| Seat Alhambra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Seat Alhambra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is smaller. Seat Alhambra is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Seat Alhambra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |