Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 10.0 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra and Ford Galaxy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Seat Alhambra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra, so Seat Alhambra quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |