Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
| Seat Alhambra 1996 engine produces 1 HP more power than Seat Alhambra 2004, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 10.4 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra 1996 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra 1996 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Alhambra 1996 is 1 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra 2004, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Alhambra 1996 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra 1996 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra 2004. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Seat Alhambra 2004 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra 1996 has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Seat Alhambra 2004, so Seat Alhambra 2004 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Alhambra has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |