Seat Alhambra 1996 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Seat Alhambra engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Due to the lower power, Seat Alhambra reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 8.7 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Alhambra consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Alhambra could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Seat Alhambra is larger. Seat Alhambra is 34 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Alhambra is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Alhambra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |